§ 01 — INDUSTRY: AIRPORTS

Airport programs, on one
platform
.

A Google data center in Hanau, developed by the NDC-GARBE joint venture, closed within approximately 2% of its approved capex with PROBIS in from pre-construction, running QS, pro forma, and cost control from the start.

~2%
Variance from approved budget at close, delivered on schedule
Flagship: Fraport AG — Terminal 3, Ausbau Süd
Photo Placeholder
Frankfurt · Munich · Berlin BER · Lima
§ 02 — Why This Is Hard To Pull Off

Four things that break a normal cost plan at scale.

01

Pre-construction is where the budget gets set

By the time steel is on site, most of the capex decisions that matter are already locked in — a pro forma built on assumptions, not a live cost structure, is the wrong tool for that stage.

02

MW and m² both have to work

IT load capacity and floor area are negotiated together with the end user — a cost overrun in one changes the economics of the other.

03

Network proximity is a cost variable, not just a location decision

Distance to a hub like DE-CIX Frankfurt affects connectivity cost assumptions baked into the original business case.

04

The end user isn't the developer

Google and NDC-GARBE need the same numbers, from two different vantage points, without reconciling two separate cost models.

§ 03 — Real Programs On PROBIS

Every program in this industry, live.

Running an airport program on spreadsheets?